Proposed budget will deeply cut domestic discretionary spending, including Education and Environmental spending!
The 2005 Budget submitted by the president last week only contained partial information for spending over the next 5 years. The spending proposals for specific programs are contained in a 1,000+ page Office of Management and Budget (OMB) computer run that was provided to some members of Congress, but was not included in the budget documents originally made available to the public.
Among the programs or program areas that would be cut are the following:
* Education for the Disadvantaged: By 2009, Title I funding (funding for school districts to improve educational outcomes for low-income and other disadvantaged children) would fall $660 million below the 2004 level adjusted for inflation.
* Environment: In 2005, funding for the Clean Water Act State Revolving Fund, which loans money to states to pay for sewage treatment plants, would be cut 37 percent below the 2004 level adjusted for inflation. The budget calls for even deeper cuts in this area by 2009.
* Veterans Health Benefits: Funding for veteran ’s health services in 2009 would fall 17 percent —or $5.7 billion —below the 2004 level, adjusted for inflation.
* Housing Assistance: Under the President ’s budget, funding for the housing voucher program, the nation ’s principal low-income housing assistance program would be cut sharply. By 2009, state and local housing agencies would be forced to reduce the number of low-income families and elderly and disabled households assisted by 600,000 —or 30 percent —or to reduce sharply the level of assistance provided to voucher tenants by raising the rents these families pay by an average of $2,000 a year. Most of these families live below the poverty line.
* Head Start and WIC: Head Start funding would fall 7 percent below baseline levels in 2009, resulting in an estimated reduction of 62,000 in the number of children able to participate in Head Start programs. In the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, funding cuts would cause the number of low-income pregnant women and young children at nutritional risk that the programs serves to be cut by approximately 450,000 by 2009.
For more info, try these links:
www.cbpp.org/2-27-04bud2.htm
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...icles/A17315-2004Feb5.html
www.cbpp.org/2-5-04bud.htm
www.ombwatch.org/article/a...leprint/2046/-1/18
Speak Out:
action.ourfuture.org/action/index.asp
Among the programs or program areas that would be cut are the following:
* Education for the Disadvantaged: By 2009, Title I funding (funding for school districts to improve educational outcomes for low-income and other disadvantaged children) would fall $660 million below the 2004 level adjusted for inflation.
* Environment: In 2005, funding for the Clean Water Act State Revolving Fund, which loans money to states to pay for sewage treatment plants, would be cut 37 percent below the 2004 level adjusted for inflation. The budget calls for even deeper cuts in this area by 2009.
* Veterans Health Benefits: Funding for veteran ’s health services in 2009 would fall 17 percent —or $5.7 billion —below the 2004 level, adjusted for inflation.
* Housing Assistance: Under the President ’s budget, funding for the housing voucher program, the nation ’s principal low-income housing assistance program would be cut sharply. By 2009, state and local housing agencies would be forced to reduce the number of low-income families and elderly and disabled households assisted by 600,000 —or 30 percent —or to reduce sharply the level of assistance provided to voucher tenants by raising the rents these families pay by an average of $2,000 a year. Most of these families live below the poverty line.
* Head Start and WIC: Head Start funding would fall 7 percent below baseline levels in 2009, resulting in an estimated reduction of 62,000 in the number of children able to participate in Head Start programs. In the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, funding cuts would cause the number of low-income pregnant women and young children at nutritional risk that the programs serves to be cut by approximately 450,000 by 2009.
For more info, try these links:
www.cbpp.org/2-27-04bud2.htm
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...icles/A17315-2004Feb5.html
www.cbpp.org/2-5-04bud.htm
www.ombwatch.org/article/a...leprint/2046/-1/18
Speak Out:
action.ourfuture.org/action/index.asp